Posted on

Huge curling changes for Brier and more

Could this be ALTA vs CAN at the Brier?

by George Karrys

The world’s biggest national curling association issued a news release today, but the news itself was unlike any released in years. Indeed, the Canadian Curling Association is charting a new path into undiscovered waters – and with that, a harsh blow has been struck against curling’s biggest and loudest gorilla in the room.

We’re talking about tradition.

“The 2012 National Curling Congress was an excellent opportunity for our members across the country to come together in Ottawa (last) week,” said CCA boss Greg Stremlaw. “Our sport has so many success stories from the past year so it was rewarding for us to provide updates to the membership as well as celebrate accomplishments, including the CCA’s Hall of Fame Luncheon – the organization’s latest initiative.”

“With the final equitable opportunity to access Canadian Championships now approved, we were able to formalize exciting changes to the CCA’s two marquee properties, the Tournament of Hearts and the Brier.”

After decades of coast-to-coast arguments and more recent coast-to-coast-to-coast hyperbole – which led to a 2010 commitment to make the Canadian championships more equitable – the Canadian men’s (Brier) and women’s (STOH) grand events are finally in for big changes. The 2014 Brier winner will receive an automatic entry into the 2015 Brier as Team Canada, while a Northern Ontario women’s team will be added to the 2015 Tournament of Hearts.

This means that the Brier and STOH will become 15-team championships that are then whittled down to a “main” – and more familiar – 12-team event, echoing the changes made to the 2012 Canadian Mixed and Canadian Seniors. And the teams at the bottom of the Brier and STOH standings will have to play a qualifying event to win their way back in for the following season.

For traditionalists, this is surely the End Of The World come nigh. The most holy Brier Tankard could be lifted in triumph by a team that did little more than win the trophy the previous year. Thirteen of the 14 teams will still have to battle over weeks and months, from December through February, in city and zone and regional and provincial championships in order to qualify for the Brier – while one team gets a bye.

This has, of course, been deemed just fine and dandy in Canadian women’s curling since the early 1980s, when that Team Canada was first created. But the men, as befitting their proud status as the ultimate power base of the sport, have always approached the concept of a Brier Team Canada with something between curiosity and abject, red-faced horror.

And now the women get to keep their Team Canada, and like the men, will also have a Northern Ontario team to go along with separate squads from the Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut.

And there’s more.

Jones and Howard: will they or won’t they?

Canada will finally join the rest of the world and host a national Mixed Doubles championship. This will happen very quickly, ie. this coming season, as the next World Mixed Doubles Championship will be hosted by Fredericton, New Brunswick, in April 2013. This is a rush job as the new championship has no dates, site location nor event structure to announce, and whatever gets thrown together will be reviewed after a two-year trial period.

The CCA will also be reviewing something else after 2013 and ’14 – the most interesting decision that normal Canadian residency rules will not apply for Mixed Doubles. This means that Ontario’s Glenn Howard can compete with Manitoba’s Jennifer Jones (photo at left); that Alberta’s John Morris can team with British Columbia’s Kelley Law; or that some city rivals – like Edmonton’s Kevin Martin and Calgary’s Cheryl Bernard – can perhaps bury the NHL hockey hatchet.

Presumably, until we hear otherwise, just about anything like this now goes – at least when it comes to Canadian Mixed Doubles.

But wait, there’s still more.

The biggest change to a new 2012-14 Rule Book will see the CCA incorporate “reverse timing” for all of its championships, where each team will be given 40 minutes of “thinking time” in which to play a 10-end game, plus five minutes to play an extra end.

This is the reverse of the traditional timing approach when each team was given 73 minutes to play, with the clock running from the time the opponent’s stones came to rest until the playing side’s stone stopped. The new approach marks the amount of time it takes to put a stone into play (or thinking time) versus the time a team is actually taking to play a shot.

This welcome change comes just two-or-so years after the World Curling Players’ Association adopted “thinking time” for its Capital One Grand Slam of Curling series, and gained immediate and near-universal support from athletes and coaches.

In other news, the CCA announced:

• A fifth consecutive year of positive financial outlook, to the tune of a $227,508 surplus;

• A $250,000 allocation into the Curling Assistance Program (CAP) in support of capital projects and membership growth;

• That Alberta won both the Dominion Member Association Cup (for excellence at national championships) and the Governors’ Cup, which marks the biggest year-to-year improvement (average point basis) at national championships;

• A formal Hall of Fame Induction Luncheon (held June 14) to honour the recent inductees to the Canadian Curling Hall of Fame – Pat Sanders of British Columbia, Millard Evans, Marv Wirth and Ken McLean of Alberta, and André  Ferland of Quebec;

• An updated Business Plan and Organizational Strategy for the Association; and

• The annual shuffle of Members of the Board of Governors, which sees New Brunswick’s Ron Hutton appointed as Chair; Nova Scotia’s Hugh Avery appointed as Vice-Chair; new Governors (five-year term) Yves Maillet of NB and Shirley Osborne of NS plus one-year term replacement Jim Mann of British Columbia; and retiring Governors Bernadette McIntyre (Saskatchewan) and Mitch Tarapasky (Manitoba).

One thing is certain: curling continues to embrace change, and the latest changes to CCA competitions show that very little in this ancient sport is sacred. Be sure to subscribe to receive your copy of the upcoming November 2012 issue of The Curling News for much more on these changes, as we’ll have updated details, poll results and tons of feedback from the names behind the game.

Event photos by Anil Mungal are copyright ® Capital One (Martin/Koe) and The Curling News (Howard/Jones). Click on each image to increase viewing size.

VN:F [1.9.20_1166]
Rating: 4.2/5 (13 votes cast)
Huge curling changes for Brier and more, 4.2 out of 5 based on 13 ratings
Be Sociable, Share!

17 thoughts on “Huge curling changes for Brier and more

  1. Good to see Team Canada coming to the mens’, it will mean more big games to watch.

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 3.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  2. “One thing is certain: curling continues to embrace change”

    Curling as a sport might embrace change, but the CCA has always strongly resisted. The entire world was playing the 4 rock rule while we stuck with 3 here in Canada. Honestly, I’m shocked to see them make these changes, but I think they will be good ones. From a marketing point of view, having a “Team Canada” that you can put on posters for next year’s Brier will be huge for them.

    Also, the change to think time is fantastic. Finally teams won’t be penalized on the clock for playing a more aggressive game with more draws. It seems like a no-brainer decision to me.. I’m not sure what arguments there ever were against it, other than “tradition”.

    Anyways, I’m glad to see the CCA finally embracing change in areas where it makes sense.

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  3. I’m not sure I agree about giving the territories more berths, but if that’s what is needed to simplify the new draw format, then so be it. Having a Team Canada in Men’s is something I’ve been wanting to see happen for a number of years. How many times have there been teams out of the Brier champion’s province, that didn’t qualify, but could very well have been one of the top teams at the Brier if not the champion. Alberta is the perfect example. These changes are going to make the sport even more exciting to watch.

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 3.5/5 (2 votes cast)
  4. I think the changes are just great……

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 3.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  5. I like Team Canada in the Brier, I like Team Northern Ontario added to STOH. But having only 12 team of 15 potential play, means the bottom teams fighting to just be in the event. What 3 teams will be left out each year? Will there be a province or territory that frequently or always misses the chance? If so, this cannot be good for curling in that province/territory. Maybe the territories should stay as a single team due to total population smaller than PEI, and reduce chance that one province or territory frequently or continually loses chance to be represented (then possibly have all remaining 13 teams play round robin). Otherwise, I like the change.

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 2.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  6. I’m curious to know the plan for reducing 15 teams to 12. Where, who, and how, will that happen?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  7. Sounds really unfair to some provinces/territories that could be left out year after year. Why make it so complicated. Just get rid of Northern Ontario in the mens to make room for Team Canada. Never understood why one province has two teams anyway

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 3.3/5 (4 votes cast)
  8. I think it is great having a Team Canada in the Brier. However having some provinces have to miss the Brier due to the curl-off is disappointing. I don’t see why there are two teams coming out of Ontario when some provinces will have none. Have one team out of Ontario not two are my thoughts. There are no other provinces that have two representatives.

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 3.8/5 (5 votes cast)
  9. No more Briers for me if it’s not a Canadian event anymore, The Maritimers and the North add so much to the Brier… The Family’s Winter Holidays will change… time to go South!!

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 3.8/5 (5 votes cast)
  10. We feel this is so wrong. Why should ONT get two teams and some areas have to fight to qualify just to get in. This is so un-Canadian. We were considering a trip to Halifax for the worlds. Maybe a trip somewhere else would be a better fit.

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 2.7/5 (3 votes cast)
  11. simply awful to descriminate against teams that don’t curl as well as others….. and why should Ontario be allowed to have 2 teams

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 3.0/5 (3 votes cast)
  12. All the CCA needs to do is allow only one team from Ontario. Why do they get 2 and no one else???

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 1.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  13. I am wondering who will be Team Canada if the skip moves to another province with a new team and the original team just gets a new skip?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  14. I think the changes suck. Canada is a country of 10 provinces and three territories, not of Northern Ont and Ont and Team Canada. This is discriminatory and the teams that have lesser chances are penalized. The Territories and the east have worked just has hard to get through their zones and provincials only to have to go through another “qualifier” and then be sent home. I saw the disappointment at the STOH when the NWT team was sent home after working so hard to get there. I believe it is all about money and feel the east and the Territories should just boycott as we are not a part of this country in the eyes of the CCA.

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 4.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  15. The Brier is, to me and many others, the most beautiful sporting event in the world. Each year, passionate amateurs from sea to shining sea represent their communities on the national stage. Real estate agents and car mechanics become provincial standard-bearers and world champions. That is remarkable and beautiful and soul-warming. No championship (besides the Tournament of Hearts) is as fundamentally Canadian or as authentically democratic as the Brier. I care about the Brier because to me it is nothing less than sacred.

    As other sports have compromised themselves for the sake of commercial interests, the Brier has been a beacon of athletic authenticity. The spirit of the game, as manifested in the good old-fashioned Brier, is what makes the game so special and so beloved. Relegation in our national events chips away at this spirit and hurts the game across the country – not just in those provinces forced into relegation.

    Now, the Slams are fantastic – it is great that they are being expanded and I am genuinely happy for curlers who will have the opportunity to play in them and entertain the faithful.

    But for the love of God, let’s keep the Brier the Brier.

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  16. Why not try to represent each province once before eliminating others. It makes no sense that Ontario requires two teams.

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  17. I do not curl but I watch. Ontario could some day have 3 teams at Brier right… what if a Team Canada team ends up in the bottom 3, who then plays off the next year?

    VA:F [1.9.20_1166]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *